Hi, this is the first time I've posted here so please forgive any mistakes ...
I was just wondering; in the UK original, the focus of the series was the Brian/Michael relationship, and they were the ones who ended up together. So, did Cowlip originally intend that in the US version, and did they just go with the Brian/Justin pairing because they realised how hot the chemistry between Gale and Randy was?
Does anybody know?
I was just wondering; in the UK original, the focus of the series was the Brian/Michael relationship, and they were the ones who ended up together. So, did Cowlip originally intend that in the US version, and did they just go with the Brian/Justin pairing because they realised how hot the chemistry between Gale and Randy was?
Does anybody know?
no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 10:19 pm (UTC)Evidence and a discussion of this here (http://amelialourdes.livejournal.com/457283.html).
And to briefly answer your question -- yes! Not really about chemistry but popularity of the pairing, I imagine. QaF UK worked that story for them and QaF US translated into something else entirely.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 10:34 pm (UTC)They made it fairly clear in the very beginning that Hal/Michael was intended to be the star. I'm sure Hal thought so too, which could explain some of his later bitterness toward Gale.
Revisionist history is what I call Cowlips' later rationalizations.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 10:59 pm (UTC)It wouldn't surprise me that that was the original intention, especially when paired with Shawn Postoff's interview. Which was also bullshit, not to mention the fact that he was pretty much saying, "Oh, all that stuff you saw? Figment of your imagination." So...yeah.
It's too bad they won't go on the record ON VIDEO OR TV and say what they intended, good or bad. We're always gonna believe that they were together at the end, even if they were in different cities.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 11:20 pm (UTC)Postoff should have been stoned. With real rocks. Real big, heavy rocks.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 11:26 pm (UTC)Asshole.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 11:41 pm (UTC)I can understand that Cowlip (being gay and not into women) could be disappointed of that fact. But, really, hetero females hold very much of subtle power in this men's world. They really can influence the general public opinion on the gay's acceptance subject.
And it's enough to see the pilot to know that in that script Michael/Brian are an obvious focus couple. It's not so in ep 103 already. I think after the pilot Cowlip took the turn to Brian/Justin centered story.
anything but Hal
Date: 2011-06-16 12:51 am (UTC)Icon by Arness
Re: anything but Hal
Date: 2011-06-16 12:54 am (UTC)Re: anything but Hal
Date: 2011-06-16 03:17 am (UTC)Re: anything but Hal
Date: 2011-06-16 04:00 am (UTC)Duly reflected in the fact that you almost never see him with the rest of the gang when they get together. Barbeque, anyone? :)
Re: anything but Hal
Date: 2011-06-16 04:14 am (UTC)Then again, I didn't like Hal Sparks years before I ever saw QAF....
Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:Re: anything but Hal
From:no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 03:09 am (UTC)Cowlip had cameras and writers, if they wanted us to feel like Brian and Justin were still together they could have conveyed that instead of feeding us "it's only time" and fading Justin away like he never existed. I mean seriously how dumb do they think we are?
no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 03:20 am (UTC)I don't have anything to add to the discussion because I basically agree that Cowlip fucked with the fans in a truly evil hissy-fit drama queen manner, but the way you worded this made me lol!!
no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 03:59 am (UTC)We're just idiots. What do we know?
no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 10:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 02:20 pm (UTC)They lost every bit of credibility with me when they allowed the characters to harp on Brian for having Stockwell as a client for all of season 3, but still allowed Ben and Melanie to become the new Philip and Tannis at the GLC for seasons 4 and 5, the same GLC that endorsed Stockwell. The hypocrisy is mind numbing.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 03:16 pm (UTC)Silly
I'm joking, please don't take that seriously.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 03:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-06-26 08:01 am (UTC)I hope you don't mind this comment:
Groups like the GLC are really important in the gay community and in society in general. They might contain some bad eggs from time to time, but that doesn't mean they should be written off. The better the membership the better the organisation, so I have no problem with Mel and Ben becoming more prominent.
I don't even blame Philip and Tannis very much. They were just a bit dumb, naive and timid, and it was quite justified for the other characters to criticise Brian for supporting Stockwell. He was in the wrong, and didn't have stupidity, naivity and timidity as excuses.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-26 07:09 pm (UTC)Brian took Stockwell on for profit, for his company, and for his future. While it wasn't the most ethical thing he could have done, he did it and it wasn't because he wanted what Stockwell was selling or the life that Stockwell was promising and that is the BIG difference between the two.
So Ben judging Brian in front of everyone at the diner, in front of his family, and questioning Brian's ethics, over Stockwell, while taking up the mantel for the same organization that endorsed him is hypocritical.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 06:46 pm (UTC)since the show ended, whether people want to believe
it or not. But the show is what it is and the ending
what it is. It's always up to debate and interpretation --
and fanfic.